Quick to hire and quick to fire, right?
The last thing that you want, conventional wisdom says, is to be carrying around dead weight on a team--or harboring a disruptive employee. Bad hires can cause your best people to want to leave. It can slow down productivity.
I agree that one person can do a disproportionate amount of damage within a company, but does that always have to be the case? And, does relying on the nuclear option of getting rid of someone create the wrong kind of culture--and perhaps even a management laziness to work things out.
To read the full, original article click on this link: - Thisisgoingtobebig.com - Quick to fire or leave no employee behind?
